National Educational Technology Standards for Teachers (NETS-T) Collection

Review Panel Guidelines for a Standard Artifact Rationale

For use by the RCOE review panel:
  • Core Faculty
  • University Supervisors
  • Academic Consultants
  • Cooperating Teachers
Dimension

In Progress

Acceptable Quality

CONTEXT

Provides only a brief description of the artifact.

Complete description including how and why the artifact was produced and in what context (grade/faculty meeting/communication with parents ) the artifact should be used.

IMPACT

Describes only the teaching context.

Explains how the strategies and knowledge represented in the artifact will be applied to NC Standard Course of Study and/or professional practice . Detailed information involving theory and practice is included. Explanation of how it will support: teaching and learning , professional development or effective communication.

ALIGNMENT Only states the NC Advanced Technology Competencies addressed. States the NETS-T addressed by the artifact. Tells how the artifact provides evidence for each competency through specific examples.

RULE

Draft qualities; a preliminary sketch, outline, or version.

Legible, organized and coherent. Correct spelling, punctuation and grammar. Clear and easy to read.

An acceptable example

Suggested Guidelines for writing an Effective Technology Rationale

Questions/Comments to: John T. Spagnolo
spagnolojt@appstate.edu
Date Last Modified: 04/09/02
RCOE, ASU, 00'

BACK